TEM (Transient electromagnetics can effectively map conductive features. However, too much conductivity will impede the ability of the technique to penetrate below shallower stronger conductors.

•Effective to ~300m depth

•Abrupt signal loss at conductive interface

•Provides high-resolution shallow data

MT (Magnetotellurics) penetrates much deeper and can highlight more subtle features.

•Penetrates to ~2,000m depth

•Images through conductive layers

•Reveals full basin architecture

Data comparison insights – Consistency in overlapping zones

Both methods show excellent correlation in the upper 300m and highlights the validity of each technique

New geological understanding as MT exposes previously hidden structures: Deep conductive zones (potential secondary brine reservoirs) as  well as basement topography and possible fault systems.

Interpretation Enhancement: The client’s geological interpretation (shown here) integrates: TEM near-surface details as well as MT deep structural framework